[FPSPACE] trouble-shooting ahead - the James Webb

David R. Woods drwoods at stny.rr.com
Sat Nov 15 15:28:51 EST 2014


I think one of the reasons that James Webb it is not going to be fully 
deployed in LEO is that the thermal foil shields are so thin, and as a 
result they might tear as the spacecraft was accelerated out of Earth 
orbit, no matter how slowly.  I do agree, that it is a shame that it and 
other spacecraft, once deployed so far away, are then out of reach for a 
repair mission.  Think of the Galileo Jupter orbiter and the Kepler 
extra-solar planets hunter as examples.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[FPSPACE] trouble-shooting ahead - the James Webb
Date: 	Sat, 15 Nov 2014 13:21:52 +0200
From: 	Keith Gottschalk <kgottschalk at uwc.ac.za>
To: 	<fpspace at friends-partners.org>

    Noting how often a simple deployment of one panel or one leg can go 
phut on the ISS or Rosetta, I have always been concerned about the 
on-orbit deployment of the mirror segments of the James Webb telescope 
at L2.  If any mirror is out of alignment (or is it collumation?) by 
even say ten angstroms, two decades of taxpayers' donations ends in 

    Would it not make better sense to unfurl everything fully in LEO, & 
only after confirmed, measured success gently boost it to its L2 
destination? This gives a last chance for servicing. It might require 
merely an astronaut or robonaut to give one good push to make something 
click into place.

- Keith

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.friends-partners.org/pipermail/fpspace/attachments/20141115/fe89b45a/attachment.html>

More information about the FPSPACE mailing list