[FPSPACE] Back to the Future (F-1 rocket engine test)

Peter Pesavento pjp961 at svol.net
Fri Jan 25 09:31:31 EST 2013


Associated Press via Yahoo

 

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-testing-vintage-engine-apollo-11-rocket-222445500
.html

 

 


NASA testing vintage engine from Apollo 11 rocket


By JAY REEVES | Associated Press - 4 hrs ago

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (AP) - Like vinyl records and skinny ties, good things
eventually come back around. At NASA, that means looking to the Apollo
program for ideas on how to develop the next generation of rockets for
future missions to the moon and beyond.

Young engineers who weren't even born when the last Saturn V rocket took off
for the moon are testing a vintage engine from the program.

The engine, known to NASA engineers as No. F-6049, was supposed to help
propel Apollo 11 into orbit in 1969, when NASA sent Neil Armstrong and two
other astronauts to the moon for the first time. The flight went off without
a hitch, but no thanks to the engine - it was grounded because of a glitch
during a test in Mississippi and later sent to the Smithsonian Institution,
where it sat for years.

Now engineers are learning to work with technical systems and propellants
not used since before the start of the space shuttle program, which first
launched in 1981.

Nick Case, 27, and other engineers at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center on
Thursday completed a series of 11 test-firings of the F-6049's gas
generator, a jet-like rocket which produces 30,000 pounds of thrust and was
used as a starter for the engine. They are trying to see whether a
second-generation version of the Apollo engine could produce even more
thrust and be operated with a throttle for deep-space exploration.

There are no plans to send the old engine into space, but it could become a
template for a new generation of motors incorporating parts of its design.

In NASA-speak, the old 18-foot-tall motor is called an F-1 engine. During
moon missions, five of them were arranged at the base of the 363-foot-tall
Saturn V system and fired together to power the rocket off the ground toward
Earth orbit.

Thursday's test used one part of the engine, the gas generator, which powers
the machinery to pump propellant into the main rocket chamber. It doesn't
produce the massive orange flame or clouds of smoke like that of a whole
F-1, but the sound was deafening as engineers fired the mechanism in an
outdoor test stand on a cool, sunny afternoon.

The device produced a plume that resembled a blow torch the size of two
buses and set fire to a grassy area, which was quickly extinguished.

"It's not small," Case said. "It's pretty beefy on its own."

And just like during the Apollo days, people in north Alabama heard rockets
thundering in the distance during tests at Marshall.

"My wife and daughter were in our front yard and she said they could hear
it, which was pretty cool," Case said after an earlier test. "We live about
15 miles away."

A single F-1 engine can produce 1.5 million pounds of thrust using a fuel
composed of liquid oxygen and refined kerosene, which was not used in the
space shuttle.

The tests were conducted at Marshall in a project conducted with Dynetics
Inc. and Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, which are studying NASA's possibilities
for deep-space missions years from now. The space agency plans to use
commercial launches to reach low Earth orbit; larger rockets are required to
escape the planet's gravity.

R.H. Coates, an engineer who works with Case in Marshall's liquid propulsion
office, said young engineers can learn a lot from the work done by
predecessors using slide-rules in the 1960s, but no one wants to simply
rebuild the old Saturn V engine.

"This wouldn't be your daddy's F-1," Coates said. "We'd use new materials
and try to simplify it, update it."

Case started at Marshall as a high school intern in 2002 and has been
working there since graduating from the University of Alabama in Huntsville
in 2008. He said today's technology allows things that weren't possible
during the 1960s, but he has been impressed by what he learned taking apart
the unused Apollo 11 engine.

Engine No. F-6049 didn't fit properly on the Apollo 11 rocket, but it is
invaluable now as a testing tool. Coates said a total of 85 F-1 engines were
used on 17 Apollo flights without a single failure.

About a dozen F-1 engines remain in Huntsville, Ala., home of NASA's main
propulsion center, and others are located elsewhere. Most are on display.
Case said engineers used engine No. F-6049 for the tests because it was the
most complete.

"It is really an excellent booster," he said. "The guys in Apollo had it
right."

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.friends-partners.org/pipermail/fpspace/attachments/20130125/ed193a27/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the FPSPACE mailing list